At its simplest, Are the Republican Senators IMMORAL or are the people they represent? The Republicans have admitted he is guilty and yet will find him not guilty. This finding is after refusing to listen to people who were first person witnesses and physical evidence after demanding such for months. They are even refusing to accept a vote for Censure. I believe the Senators are a immoral and acting against the will of the people they are supposed to represent. I hope the Republican voters are making a list of who to vote out of office.
for the demise of our democratic republic. We now have a dictatorship if the senate Republicans acquit after a show trial. They admit he did it, but since he sees his winning is good for the country, it’s ok. Therefore, if he equates what is good for himself with what is good for the country any action is fine. He is now investigator of his actions, judge of his actions, jury of his actions. Welcome to the Republican’s new lawless banana republic.
Was he in on the call to Ukraine’s president?
Was he one of the three amigos?
Was he witness during the bringing of impeachment charges?
Was he subpoenaed by the Republicans during the hearings?
Why was and is he not subpoeneaed by the Republicans when to this day they have the power to do so without the votes of any Democrats?
HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ACTIONS OF THIS PRESIDENT IN THE ATTEMPTED BRIBING OF UKRAINE!
Impeachment is so that a person who is a danger to the country by putting himself above the law can be stopped. Should we wait until he launches nuclear weapons? Until he appoints Putin Head of the CIA? If you look at his behavior, he CONTINUES to act like Putin’s asset.
So far I have heard about O’bama, Biden, Schiff, the Democrats and others.
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE PROVING TRUMP’S INNOCENCE?
Something for something.
Diplomats do it all the time (for their country).
This President, Donald J. Trump, did it FOR HIS OWN PERSONAL GAIN.
There in is the problem. The former is legal for a politician and the latter is illegal.
If it was legal, why all the attempts to hide it?
PLEASE REMEMBER IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL THAT THE ATTORNEYS ARE NOT SPEAKING UNDER OATH. LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY REFER TO, NOT AT THE OPINIONS THEY PRESENT. THEY CAN SAY ANYTHING THEY ARE NOT UNDER OATH.
What have the Republicans presented that is factually verifiable?