The NRA has always been about protecting the rights of gun owners to:
self protect and
I firmly believe that gun owners have the right to pursue those interests.
What were those people in Wisconsin hunting?
What targets were they practicing on?
Who was threatening them? (It appears they were the ones doing the threatening.)
And the weapons were not being displayed as part of a collection or collectable .
WHY HASN’T THE NRA, OUR SENATORS, OUR PRESIDENT DISAVOWED THE ACTIONS OF THESE SO CALLED PROTESTORS ?
WHY WERE THEY NOT ARRESTED BY THE POLICE AS THEY SHOUTED IN THEIR FACES AND REFUSED TO FOLLOW POLICE ORDERS?
Sounds like a Trumpian promise. (Full of nothing, meaning nothing)
President Trump Travels To Texas, Ohio, Says No Appetite For Assault Rifle Ban – https://www.npr.org/2019/08/07/748848662/trump-heads-to-el-paso-and-dayton-amid-skepticism-from-local-leaders
mumbled through cheeks stuffed with cookies.
President Trump On Dayton, El Paso Shootings: ‘Hate Has No Place’ In U.S. – https://www.npr.org/2019/08/05/748190808/trump-calls-for-strong-background-checks-following-el-paso-and-dayton-shootings
If it were not for the existence of guns, mental illness and hatred would have no trigger to pull.
What if the good guy with a gun becomes a bad guy with a gun?
What if the good guy with a gun meets a bad guy with a bigger clip?
What if a good guy with a 22 meets a bad guy with a 38?
What if a good guy with a 38 meets a bad guy with a 45?
What if good guy with a 45 meets a bad guy with a grenade?
What if a good guy with a grenade meets a bad guy with an IED?
What if a good guy with an IED meets a bad guy with a drone?
What if a good guy with a drone meets a bad guy with an atom bomb?
WHAT IF WE REALIZE HOW RIDICULOUS THIS ARGUMENT BY THE NRA LEADERSHIP IS?